...and all this is to whom?

email: encyclical at gmail.com

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

I pledge allegiance...

U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton ruled that the pledge's reference to one nation "under God" violates school children's right to be "free from a coercive requirement to affirm God."


The CNN article also states that:

The decisions by Karlton and the 9th Circuit conflict with an August opinion by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. That court upheld a Virginia law requiring public schools lead daily Pledge of Allegiance recitation, which is similar to the requirement in California.

A three-judge panel of that circuit ruled that the pledge is a patriotic exercise, not a religious affirmation similar to a prayer.

"Undoubtedly, the pledge contains a religious phrase, and it is demeaning to persons of any faith to assert that the words 'under God' contain no religious significance," Judge Karen Williams wrote for the 4th Circuit. "The inclusion of those two words, however, does not alter the nature of the pledge as a patriotic activity."


This reminds me of a song by Propagandhi titled "Showdown"

We spoke our minds too clearly.
We assumed fundamental rights were inherent
not as pawns but men.
I do not require a gauge for freedom of speech
cuz I never asked to be a citizen.
I never have and never will pledge allegiance.

1 Comments:

  • At 15 September, 2005 06:24, Blogger Sj said…

    Funny, I'm ALSO an American living in Toronto.. ( I guess it isn't THAT unusual )

    It's funny you say AGAIN? Because apparently this was brought to court by someone who has been in the news before fighting these things. In other words one man's personal agenda more than nation wide movement.

    YET.. this has a big effect.

    Personally: I guess because I moved here when I was 5 I was too young to have gone to school and SO I myself never did once say that pledge.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home