I've been involved in a few Blog comment debates as of late. (usually here)
All the back and forth comments made me think about the nature of the debaters.
(Of course someone could read what I wrote and over analyze it as well..)
Typing out an idea is different than speaking about one. When someone is reading a post, (rather than a novel or other story) they usually have to infer about why you are posting, what mood you're in, what your background is...
When you feel strongly about a subject and only have 1000 characters to tell your side in @ one time.. it's hard not to come across as single minded.
I just wonder how many people might expect to "win" someone by one post?
thoughts out in the ether
All the back and forth comments made me think about the nature of the debaters.
(Of course someone could read what I wrote and over analyze it as well..)
Typing out an idea is different than speaking about one. When someone is reading a post, (rather than a novel or other story) they usually have to infer about why you are posting, what mood you're in, what your background is...
When you feel strongly about a subject and only have 1000 characters to tell your side in @ one time.. it's hard not to come across as single minded.
I just wonder how many people might expect to "win" someone by one post?
thoughts out in the ether
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home