...very sad

What if I told you, that using normal techniques, HIV has never been proven to cause AIDS? What would this mean to you? We accept at times that because of money, scientific research is strained or moved or stopped. We accept it, not because we like it, but because we are realistic. We watch movies like "The Constant Gardiner" and understand that, though a movie, this is real. Well, do not dismiss out of hand the claim that AIDS research, based on HIV, might be motivated by more than a desire to heal.

"The HIV hypothesis ranks with the 'bad air' theory for malaria and the 'bacterial infection' theory of beriberi and pellagra [caused by nutritional deficiencies]. It is a hoax that became a scam." - Dr. Bernard Forscher, frmr editor - U.S. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences

"I think zidovudine [AZT] was never really evaluated properly and that its efficacy has never been proved, but it's toxicity certainly is important. And I think it has killed a lot of people. Especially at the high doses. I personally think it not worth using alone or in combination at all." - Dr. Andrew Herxheimer - Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford

"In the old days it was required that a scientist address the possibilities of proving his hypothesis wrong as well as right. Now there's none of that in standard HIV-AIDS program with all its billions of dollars." - Dr. Richard Strohman - Emeritus Professor of Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley

"I do not regard the causal relationship between HIV and any disease as settled. I have seen considerable evidence that highly improper statistics concerning HIV and AIDS have been passed off as science, and that top members of the scientific establishment have carelessly, if not irresponsible, joined the media in spreading misinformation about the nature of AIDS." - Dr. Serge Lang, Professor of Mathematics, Yale University

"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document." - Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry

Just something to ponder rather than simply tossing it out. Is it possible? Is any part of Fahrenheit 9/11, (that people fight against) true? Did Operation Paperclip happen? Does Israel have nukes? Did Bush lie? Is there at least a possibility? And if our decision to give people killer drugs to combat AIDS as caused by HIV (they aren't fighting to say that AIDS does not exist but that there is no proof of a relationship) is based on nothing but $$$, do we not have some obligation to try and find out?